"April hath put a spirit of youth in everything", Happy April! @TRY3STEPS.COM
Dear Reader, If you use TRY3STEPS a lot, this message is for you. This incredible nonprofit organization helps the world with answers. We love you, we share answers. Your love helps us thrive. The more we give, the more we have! Thank you for inspiring us. (Secure PayPal)

*Everything counts! No minimum transaction limit!
Stay Updated with the World! Subscribe Now:: YouTube.com/c/Try3Steps
Say Hello to Try3Steps Group! Join Now:: GoogleGroup@Try3Steps

Search Another Question

Nov 13, 2019

[Answer] Which one of the four railroads in Monopoly was not a real railroad?

Step 1 : Introduction to the question "Which one of the four railroads in Monopoly was not a real railroad?"



...The railroads in the game of Monopoly are the Pennsylvania Railroad, Reading Railroad, B & O Railroad, and Short Line. Of these four monopoly properties, only three of them were real railroads. Short Line was not a real railroad. The Short Line was named after the Shore Fast Line, a streetcar line rather than a railroad. Charles and Olive Todd, who taught the game to Charles Darrow, its eventual patentee, shortened the name on their board to Short Line. The B & O, Pennsylvania, and Reading railroads were real railroads that operated on the East Coast, although B & O did not actually serve Atlantic City.




Step 2 : Answer to the question "Which one of the four railroads in Monopoly was not a real railroad?"



Short Line:


Please let us know as comment, if the answer is not correct!


Step 3 : Disclaimer & Terms of Use regarding the question "Which one of the four railroads in Monopoly was not a real railroad?"


Our machine learning tool trying its best to find the relevant answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Share our work with whom you care, along with your comment ...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.

Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment

No comments:

Post a Comment